Sacubitril/Valsartan vs Enalapril in Heart Failure due to Chagas Disease

Sacubitril/Valsartan vs Enalapril in Heart Failure due to Chagas Disease

Chagas disease, caused by Trypanosoma cruzi, is a leading cause of non-ischemic cardiomyopathy in Latin America, affecting 6–7 million people. Despite clear benefit of sacubitril/valsartan over enalapril in HFrEF of other etiologies (PARADIGM-HF trial), its efficacy in Chagas cardiomyopathy remained unknown due to distinct pathophysiology involving chronic inflammation, fibrosis, and microvascular dysfunction.

Tirzepatide Withdrawal: Weight Regain and Cardiometabolic Reversals in Obesity

Tirzepatide Withdrawal: Weight Regain and Cardiometabolic Reversals in Obesity

Tirzepatide, a dual GLP-1/GIP receptor agonist, induces substantial weight loss and cardiometabolic improvements in adults with obesity. However, the SURMOUNT-4 trial demonstrated that most participants regain weight upon discontinuation, raising questions about the durability of associated health benefits. The objective is to evaluate changes in cardiometabolic parameters stratified by the extent of weight regain following tirzepatide withdrawal in the SURMOUNT-4 trial.

Disproportionality Signals: Sacubitril/Valsartan vs. Valsartan Adverse Events in FAERS

Disproportionality Signals: Sacubitril/Valsartan vs. Valsartan Adverse Events in FAERS

Sacubitril/valsartan, an angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI), has revolutionized heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) management since its 2015 approval, demonstrating superior efficacy over ACE inhibitors in the PARADIGM-HF trial. However, real-world safety concerns, particularly regarding angioedema and renal effects, necessitate post-marketing surveillance. This study conducts a disproportionality analysis using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database to compare adverse drug events (ADEs) between sacubitril/valsartan and valsartan monotherapy, aiming to detect pharmacovigilance signals and guide clinical decision-making.

2025 ACC/AHA Guideline: Core Competencies for Advanced Cardiovascular Imaging Training

2025 ACC/AHA Guideline: Core Competencies for Advanced Cardiovascular Imaging Training

Advanced cardiovascular imaging plays a pivotal role in diagnosing, risk-stratifying, and managing a spectrum of cardiac conditions, from ischemic heart disease to cardiomyopathies and valvular disorders. However, rapid technological evolution—spanning echocardiography (echo), cardiovascular computed tomography (CCT), cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR), and nuclear cardiology—demands rigorous, standardized training to ensure competency and patient safety. The 2025 Advanced Training Statement on Advanced Cardiovascular Imaging, jointly authored by the American College of Cardiology (ACC), American Heart Association (AHA), American Society of Echocardiography (ASE), American Society of Nuclear Cardiology (ASNC), Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography (SCCT), and Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (SCMR), and issued by the ACC Competency Management Committee, addresses this need by updating prior frameworks to reflect contemporary practice.

DANISH Extended Follow-Up: No All-Cause Mortality Benefit from ICD in Nonischemic HFrEF at 13 Years

DANISH Extended Follow-Up: No All-Cause Mortality Benefit from ICD in Nonischemic HFrEF at 13 Years

The extended follow-up of the DANISH trial, published in the Journal of the American College of Cardiology on October 22, 2025, provides critical long-term insights into the role of primary prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) in patients with nonischemic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Originally published in 2016 with a median follow-up of 5.6 years, the trial showed no significant reduction in all-cause mortality with ICDs. This new analysis extends median follow-up to 13.2 years (IQR 11.6–14.6 years), tracking 1,116 randomized patients until death or January 31, 2024.